YOU MIGHT BE A CONSTITUTIONALIST IF…
I agreed with only 16 out of 30 on this (sort of) test. Personally, I don’t mind that machine guns are generally unavailable, and I fail to see how the income tax is unconstitutional, especially since, you know, it’s in the Constitution.
Looks like Izzy’s going to have to soldier on without me in this cycle.
7 Responses to “YOU MIGHT BE A CONSTITUTIONALIST IF…”
 Comment by speedwell August 8th, 2006 at 9:40 am |
Yeah, there are several slimy attempts in that article to pretend the separation of church and state is unconstitutional. If the writer was a real Consitutionalist, maybe they would know more about the personal beliefs and motivations of the people who wrote the document. Ya think maybe? |
 Comment by Darren August 8th, 2006 at 10:50 am |
I got 16 or 17 (lost count). I guess I flunk the True Conservative (TM) test. 🙂 |
 Comment by Izzy August 8th, 2006 at 7:03 pm |
Hey, I’m happy to do the constitutionalist thing and the cycling thing, without the steroids or macho talk. But you are now a supporter of universal pre-school? I’m, like, very perplexed. |
 Comment by Daryl Cobranchi August 8th, 2006 at 8:34 pm |
Do you believe this is a firm foundaation for a governing philosphy?
No, I don’t agree with Lamont on everything. But I disagree with the GOP on NEARLY everything. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. |
|
Comment by Daryl Cobranchi August 8th, 2006 at 9:18 pm |
Hey, I’m happy to do the constitutionalist thing and the cycling thing, without the steroids or macho talk. Cycle, as in election cycle. |
|
Comment by Daryl Cobranchi August 8th, 2006 at 9:25 pm |
I guess I flunk the True Conservative â„¢ test. 🙂 Don’t let Farris know. 🙂 |
|
Comment by Izzy August 8th, 2006 at 10:44 pm |
Ya talking to me about #25? I heard Eve was framed. I’m no fan of the current Republican administration but I can’t imagine ever supporting the party of the vociferously anti-homeschool NEA. What a mess! Millionaire Lamont, as of this writing, is winning. |