BAD SCIENCE, AMATEUR DIVISION
Don Gookins has a really good bad example.
UPDATE: As pointed out in the comments, I was wrong. The original letter was a joke (albeit real).
2 Responses to “BAD SCIENCE, AMATEUR DIVISION”
 Comment by freerangelife April 25th, 2007 at 5:57 pm |
Bad science, yes, but not on Mr. Meskimen’s part. Did ANYBODY (including Don) bother to actually click on and then READ the Snopes page? Beyond the part where it says “True,” I mean. |
 Comment by Sandra April 25th, 2007 at 10:25 pm |
I left a comment at Don’s site this afternoon but I’m not sure if it’s posted yet. But the Snopes page listed several satirical letters written by this person. I figure the global warming/Democrats’ fault letter is sarcasm. Better yet, it’s probably publicity, too, if this person is also the attorney COD noted. Reading all the responses made me think “name recognition” — as in bad publicity is still publicity. |