Utterly Meaningless

Interestingly enough, most of the Christians in my little circle think that Huck is a horrible candidate and don’t want anything to do with him. I’ve gone so far as to tell my ultra-conservative in-laws that if Huck is the candidate, I’m not voting Republican (okay – the fun of shocking my mother-in-law played into that comment more than more my dislike of Huck).

I know that the readership here is overwhelming Democrat – so who is the better candidate – Hillary or Obama – and why?

Define “better.”

I’m no Huckabee fan but that particular article struck me as a bit harsh. Huck may be slick, but I think he’s sincere about his faith. There are plenty enough grounds on which to criticize him without playing the religion card (same goes for Romney).

so who is the better candidate – Hillary or Obama – and why?
*************

Edwards.

Because he might actually do something different — help real people.

Nance

Considering the fact Edwards made most of his money off of suing real people (as opposed to fake people, I guess), I rather doubt it.

As opposed to the Mittster who made his by laying off thousands.

And, actually, Edwards made his money by suing corporations who really are “fake” people.

I don’t favor any of them for policy or personality, because I’ve concluded it really doesn’t matter enough who is in the White House or else we’d have a lot of stuff fixed by now — but — I’ve recently been thinking at at least Obama has symbolic figurehead value to the rest of the world. that our nation needs badly, times being what they are.

Now if he would just disavow that back-centric preacher of his. . .

Daryl, shouldn’t you be for Edwards just for the Seneca connection if nothing else? Seneca’s never been so famous as it is tonight with the SC primary analysis . . .

We are Edwardians. He’s the most progressive of the three and has really been driving the debate.

And the Seneca connection is a little bit cool. Lydia’s parents know Edwards’.