Utterly Meaningless » Blog Archive » ANOTHER HOMESCHOOLER AGAINST HUCKABEE
  • ANOTHER HOMESCHOOLER AGAINST HUCKABEE

    Filed at 7:17 am under by dcobranchi

    He’s a Paulite, so take it with a grain of salt.

    10 Responses to “ANOTHER HOMESCHOOLER AGAINST HUCKABEE”


    Comment by
    JP
    January 21st, 2008
    at 5:45 pm

    Interestingly enough, most of the Christians in my little circle think that Huck is a horrible candidate and don’t want anything to do with him. I’ve gone so far as to tell my ultra-conservative in-laws that if Huck is the candidate, I’m not voting Republican (okay – the fun of shocking my mother-in-law played into that comment more than more my dislike of Huck).

    I know that the readership here is overwhelming Democrat – so who is the better candidate – Hillary or Obama – and why?


    Comment by
    Daryl Cobranchi
    January 21st, 2008
    at 5:56 pm

    Define “better.”


    Comment by
    Crimson Wife
    January 22nd, 2008
    at 3:38 am

    I’m no Huckabee fan but that particular article struck me as a bit harsh. Huck may be slick, but I think he’s sincere about his faith. There are plenty enough grounds on which to criticize him without playing the religion card (same goes for Romney).


    Comment by
    Nance Confer
    January 22nd, 2008
    at 7:12 am

    so who is the better candidate – Hillary or Obama – and why?
    *************

    Edwards.

    Because he might actually do something different — help real people.

    Nance


    Comment by
    Rochelle
    January 23rd, 2008
    at 11:00 am

    Considering the fact Edwards made most of his money off of suing real people (as opposed to fake people, I guess), I rather doubt it.


    Comment by
    Daryl Cobranchi
    January 23rd, 2008
    at 11:38 am

    As opposed to the Mittster who made his by laying off thousands.


    Comment by
    Daryl Cobranchi
    January 23rd, 2008
    at 11:39 am

    And, actually, Edwards made his money by suing corporations who really are “fake” people.


    Comment by
    JJ Ross
    January 24th, 2008
    at 10:37 pm

    I don’t favor any of them for policy or personality, because I’ve concluded it really doesn’t matter enough who is in the White House or else we’d have a lot of stuff fixed by now — but — I’ve recently been thinking at at least Obama has symbolic figurehead value to the rest of the world. that our nation needs badly, times being what they are.

    Now if he would just disavow that back-centric preacher of his. . .


    Comment by
    JJ Ross
    January 26th, 2008
    at 9:20 pm

    Daryl, shouldn’t you be for Edwards just for the Seneca connection if nothing else? Seneca’s never been so famous as it is tonight with the SC primary analysis . . .


    Comment by
    Daryl Cobranchi
    January 26th, 2008
    at 9:54 pm

    We are Edwardians. He’s the most progressive of the three and has really been driving the debate.

    And the Seneca connection is a little bit cool. Lydia’s parents know Edwards’.