Utterly Meaningless » Blog Archive » NO NC DEBATE
  • NO NC DEBATE

    Filed at 5:47 am under by dcobranchi

    Our long national nightmare is over.

    10 Responses to “NO NC DEBATE”


    Comment by
    Nance Confer
    April 18th, 2008
    at 8:33 am

    Sadly, I’m sure we will have to endure debates when it’s just Obama and McCain. 🙁

    Nance


    Comment by
    Steve Ford
    April 18th, 2008
    at 9:35 am

    When was the last time the media, or anyone, questioned a white Presidential Candidate’s patriotism? It’s sick and it’s sad. Attempted character assassination, innuendo and bold-faced lies are always the clearest signs of desperation.

    I am far less concerned about which politicians are wearing American Flag Lapel Pins, than which ones are sending my brothers and sisters thousands of miles away to die in the desert under false pretenses to satisfy the whims of a small group of wealthy draft-dodgers with more greed than common sense.

    I question Hillary Clinton’s patriotism. I question Condoleezza Rice, Dick Cheney and George Bush’s patriotism. I question Donald Rumsfeld’s and Paul Wolfowitz’s patriotism and any other politician that supported the abomination known as “George W. Bush’s Iraq War.”


    Comment by
    jim in pennsylvania
    April 18th, 2008
    at 10:32 am

    Pennsylvania voters are on to the THREE RING CIRCUS AND FAST EDDIE—-re ED RENDALL
    PENNSYLVANIA VOTERS WONT VOTE FOR HILARY THE LIAR \
    HERE ARE JUST A FEW OF THE REASONS
    NAFTA
    BOSNIA
    MONICA LEWNESKY
    BILLS DOUBLE LIES ABOUT HER BOSNIA COMMENTS AND HER SPAT WITH BILL TELLING THE PENNSYLVANIA VOTERS SHE CAN LIE BETTER THAN BILL CAN
    BILL MAY HAVE FOUND ANOTHER MONICA TWIN IN PENNSYLVANIA
    CHELSEA IS A 100% PURE ELITIST AND PANDERER
    CHELSEA VISITS BOYFRIEND IN JAIL
    THE CLINTON DIRTY CAMPAIGN DO ANYTHING TO WIN
    HAS SOURED THE PENNSYLVANIA VOTERS FOR GOOD
    NO MORE BUSH NO MORE LYING CLINTONS


    Comment by
    jim in pennsylvania
    April 18th, 2008
    at 10:37 am

    HILARY CLINTON LAWYERS RESCHEDULE THE PAUL VS CLINTON TRIAL TO APRIL THE 25TH
    ORIGINAL TRIAL DATE WAS APRIL 4TH
    I WONDER WHY
    LA TIMES REPORTS HILARY CLINTON COULD BE INDICTED FOR PERGURY AND FRAUD ON THE APRIL 25TH
    SOUNDS LIKE SHE IS PULLING ANOTHER NAFTA LIE LIKE SHE DID TO THE OHIO VOTERS OHIO VOTERS WANT A REVOTE NOW THAT THEY KNOW THE TRUTH.
    LATEST BLOG REPORTS
    HILARY SAYS SCREW THE BLUE COLLAR WORKERS WHO DONT VOTE FOR HER IN PENNSYLVANIA ON THE 22ND


    Comment by
    Lisa Giebitz
    April 18th, 2008
    at 10:49 am

    Gee-whiz, Darryl – You sure managed to draw out the trolls on this one, heh.

    Excuse my ignorance, but when the hell will the Democrats pick a nominee for the GE?


    Comment by
    Lisa Giebitz
    April 18th, 2008
    at 10:49 am

    Gee-whiz, Daryl – You sure managed to draw out the trolls on this one, heh.

    Excuse my ignorance, but when the hell will the Democrats pick a nominee for the GE?


    Comment by
    Daryl Cobranchi
    April 18th, 2008
    at 10:57 am

    They’ve already picked one. Hillary is a dead woman walking. She’ll finally recognize it on May 7th. BTW, I predicted that NC would be the decisive primary 2 months ago.


    Comment by
    sonia
    April 18th, 2008
    at 8:34 pm

    What is amazing to me is that after an entire campaign predicated on saying nothing of substance, and only giving the same speech about change and hope and “yes we can”, and Obama’s less than favourite cousin, Dick Cheney and trying to inspire a quasi-religious movement, suddenly Obama is complaining about how no questions of substance were asked for the first 45 minutes of the debate. As if people shouldn’t really be asking my Obama stayed in the church in which the preacher is a racist bigot, and whose paper published articles by Hamas leaders. Or questions about why he thinks it’s okay to go to San Francisco, and in a closed session in front of rich contributors explain how all small town Americans are a bitter gun toting religious bigots. I think the debate was absolutely fair and if Obama thinks this is tough, he will completely fall apart in the general election.


    Comment by
    NanceConfer
    April 19th, 2008
    at 7:27 pm

    The complaint about the debate was not that it wasn’t fair so much as it was a complete waste of time.

    Nance


    Comment by
    Klaus
    April 23rd, 2008
    at 6:40 am

    Democrats will unite behind the successful presidential nominee winner in PA, NY, IL, and MA…OR BLUE STATES that voted for Hillary in the primaries. Those blue states will vote Obama in November if he’s the nominee. Let’s be realistic here! They are both great candidates and no doubt would make great presidents. But there can be only one, and it looks like Obama

    Obama has garnered huge amounts of interest from new and young voters, which the democrats desperately need. His fundraising capabilities from the Internet and small donations are unheard of! He was not taken that seriously by Clinton or the other established candidates when he entered the race….little did they know. Now the Clinton campaign feels like it’s been t-boned by a Mack truck.

    Obama has the attributes of MLK and RFK and it’s generating excitement in politics like we haven’t seen since the 60’s. Clinton can’t steal republican votes because she is polarizing. Obama can, because his message reaches over to those moderate republicans and independents.

    Clinton will not be able to stop the Obama express, only slow down the inevitable. I can understand Clinton’s disappointment; she thought it would be an inauguration, a crowning, and an entitlement so to speak. But Obama came along, her dream shattered with a new one in the making.

    Once the primaries are over, Hillary should show some grace and bow out, for the good of her friends in the Democratic Party (DNC), the party faithful and most importantly, the USA. Hillary needs to get behind Obama and start focusing on beating McCain in November.

    Hillary will not overtake Obama. Do the math! On the CNN delegate counter, if Hillary wins 55% to 45% on the remaining primaries (highly unlikely), she will still be well behind in the delegate count and popular vote. The Supers would play political suicide, reversing that count.

    As for FL and MI Delegates, seat them evenly at the convention 50% Obama and 50% Clinton. They new the rules and broke them. Rules do not get changed in the middle of the game. Their Supers will remain neutral. Clinton can rant and rave all she wants, but she agreed with the DNC decision when the gauntlet was dropped, as did all the other candidates. Obama didn’t even have his name up in MI.

    That’s what happens when you try to steal the campaign attention from smaller states that traditionally hold their primaries earlier in the year. Smaller states count too (ask Obama). Obama deserves credit; he has fought tooth and nail for every caucus and primary to date. Even in states that overwhelmingly support Clinton. This is why he is winning and will be the President of the USA. Obama will not quit because he loves his country and the world in which we all share.

    It’s time to move on. No more spin, it’s time to win.