THIS COULD BE TROUBLE
Can’t wait to hear the details of this one (no need to cick over — this is the full text):
Williamson County State’s Attorney Charles Garnati today announced he would file charges against the mother of a 15-year-old student in Marion, alleging she has abused the home schooling rules and has let her child become nothing more than a truant.
Garnati admitted this was an unprecedented legal move but indicated he is fed up with parents who aren’t responsibly home schooling their children and following curriculum.
Garnati said he is a proponent of home schooling, but is willing to make an example of those who are doing a poor job of providing their children and education.
Full details will be published in Friday’s edition of The Southern Illinoisan.
I wonder if this fellow realizes that “responsibly home schooling” and “following curriculum” aren’t necessarily synonymous.
13 Responses to “THIS COULD BE TROUBLE”
![]() Comment by Gene April 28th, 2005 at 4:11 pm |
I wonder how are they going to prove he is uneducated. Are they going to give him a test in each subject?… And what if he outscores at least one g-school student in every subject; would the school get charges filed against them next? I think testing him like that would be very risky for the school and I am sure the school realizes this and would not allow it…so back to how do they prove it? |
![]() Comment by Anonymous April 28th, 2005 at 4:23 pm |
This should be interesting because there is no homeschool statute in Illinois. Homeschoolers are operating “private schools”. |
![]() Comment by Gene April 28th, 2005 at 6:22 pm |
I think this is going to be one can of worms the educrats are going to wish hadn’t been opened. |
![]() Comment by Spunky April 28th, 2005 at 7:02 pm |
OK call me curious but I tried the link here and also in one sent to me by e-mail and neither link worked. Is it my computer or did they pull the story? Spunky |
![]() Comment by Chris April 28th, 2005 at 7:44 pm |
Not just you spunky. The story is gone and doesn’t come up on a site search either. |
![]() Comment by Spunky April 28th, 2005 at 7:46 pm |
I did a search of the paper to see if I could find it that way. I came up short. But I did find an interesting little blurb about a Drivers Ed. teacher caught driving drunk who was reinstated after he plead guilty in the same city. This mother must have done something pretty awful if their letting a drunk driver teach drivers ed. again! I wonder what the “abuse” is? (Your track back isn’t working or I would have pinged you so go check out my latest post if you want to read the story.) |
![]() Comment by Jeanne April 28th, 2005 at 10:28 pm |
Sigh. Well, let us know where the minions need to go next to do your bidding. Jeanne |
![]() Comment by Gene April 29th, 2005 at 12:35 am |
He probably realized this could backfire and decided not to follow through. |
![]() Comment by Daryl Cobranchi April 29th, 2005 at 6:32 am |
I read on one of the listservs that the paper is having trouble with their server. |
![]() Comment by Chris April 29th, 2005 at 9:40 am |
Maybe we “slashdotted” them 🙂 For the non-geeky…slashdotted is a term to describe your server melting when slashdot.org links to it and tens of thousands of geeks try to hit the site at the same time. |
![]() Comment by Anonymous May 1st, 2005 at 2:27 am |
Go back less than a week from the DUI Driver’s Ed instructor and you’ll find another story about a teacher/coach facing criminal charges. Sex again. |
![]() Comment by Daniel May 4th, 2005 at 6:46 am |
try this link: |
![]() Comment by Daniel May 4th, 2005 at 7:01 am |
“I wonder how are they going to prove he is uneducated. Are they going to give him a test in each subject?… And what if he outscores at least one g-school student in every subject; would the school get charges filed against them next? I think testing him like that would be very risky for the school and I am sure the school realizes this and would not allow it…so back to how do they prove it?” They don’t have to prove he’s uneducated – all they are going to try to prove is that his mom allowed him to skip school. They are trying to put the burden of proof of homeschooling on the mother. They may not even be all that concerned with a big win – if they can get any kind of concessions out of her (e.g. a plea to a lesser offense), then they will have established this as a valid weapon against homeschoolers in general. If they win, it will set a precedent other states could follow as well. |