QOTD
From the founder of our answer to Wikepedia:
[C]onsider the entry on Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton (b. 1947). She “may suffer from a psychological condition that would raise questions about her fitness for office” — namely, “clinical narcissism,” Conservapedia asserts. Evidence of her instability includes her “ever-changing opinion of the Iraq war.” Though Schlafly demands that entries be rigorously footnoted, these sentences are not.
Schlafly calls the armchair psychology “borderline in acceptability” for his site, but he defends the Clinton article on balance as “an objective, bias-free piece from a conservative perspective.”
Objective and bias-free. Almost as true as “fair and balanced.”
One Response to “QOTD”
 Comment by Nance Confer June 19th, 2007 at 8:16 am |
Objective and bias-free AND from a conservative perspective? Well, at least they’ve included the last part as opposed to trying to pawn this garbage off as really objective. Nance |