THANKS, DON
Click on over. You won’t regret it.
8 Responses to “THANKS, DON”
![]() Comment by Rob October 24th, 2008 at 12:15 pm |
That’s funny. In other news, any comment on this story? I only ask because your Pontius Palin post advanced the notion that Palin is somehow connected to the random nut hollering for Ayer’s death. Is Obama connected to the random nut severely beating a young woman just because of a bumper sticker? I figure internal consistency demands the same answer to both questions. |
![]() Comment by Daryl Cobranchi October 24th, 2008 at 12:58 pm |
Comment? Yes, it’s a hoax. |
![]() Comment by Daryl Cobranchi October 24th, 2008 at 1:57 pm |
|
![]() Comment by Rob October 24th, 2008 at 3:48 pm |
Sweet – and as demanded by internal consistency… |
![]() Comment by Daryl Cobranchi October 24th, 2008 at 4:31 pm |
Not exactly the same, Rob. A reporter who was there heard it. And he has not recanted. When he does, I’ll grant you the internal consistency. Until then… |
![]() Comment by COD October 24th, 2008 at 6:13 pm |
Reporters are part of the liberal media elite. They can’t be trusted. |
![]() Comment by Nance Confer October 24th, 2008 at 6:16 pm |
Rob, the Obama campaign came out with a gracious comment about the poor, sad (it turns out probably nuts) McCain supporter as this story was unfolding. Has the McCain campaign made statements about the many real assaults on Obama supporters — the tire slashings, the car vandalism, the spitting, etc.? We don’t need a tit-for-tat on all of this but I’m seeing one campaign try to elevate the tenor of the debate and the other. . . not. Nance |
![]() Comment by Daryl Cobranchi October 24th, 2008 at 6:21 pm |
That’s the difference between a confident campaign and a losing one. I am really looking forward to the fratricidal war we’ll see starting 11/5. Who lost the WH? |