LOTD
Just because I thought y’all could use a bit of sheer insanity to go along with your morning coffee:
Stop gay marriage to uphold identity
What does it mean to be homosexual?
There are very few perfect males and females. We were created with DNA that determines our sexual orientation. Culture, religion and environment also play big roles.
We are created on a line: one extreme is the macho, the other the overly compassionate. The expanded middle is the “normal,” who have an almost equal portion of male and female traits.
Machos are aggressive, hard-driving, self-centered with rigid beliefs and tunnel vision. The opposite are those who have a laid-back tendency, want to nurture everyone who is hurting or despondent, with tendencies to love, accept and embrace every new idea that comes along.
At this point, there is nothing wrong with the picture. It becomes distorted when couples lose their identity by not celebrating their position on the line. They drop off when they need someone else to affirm their masculinity or femininity.
Psychology lost its scientific credibility by claiming a proposed DNA structure to affirm homosexuality. That has not been scientifically proven.
Vermont has legalized gay marriages through its legislature rather than judicial process, which will be exploited throughout the states. Gays do not want tolerance of civil union but will only settle for marriage, and President Obama has promised to appeal the Defense of Marriage Act.
If we want to uphold the right to true femininity or masculinity, then the time to stop gay marriages is now before the train gains any more speed.
Ray Miller
Fayetteville
13 Responses to “LOTD”
 Comment by Nance Confer May 16th, 2009 at 2:09 pm |
WTF??? Nance |
 Comment by Doc May 16th, 2009 at 4:49 pm |
I’d like to punch that guy in the face. |
|
Comment by Nance Confer May 16th, 2009 at 5:33 pm |
How very unfeminine of you, Doc. 🙂 Not saying it’s not a good idea. . . Nance |
 Comment by Mary May 16th, 2009 at 5:59 pm |
Seems to me Mr. Miller knows a whole lot about being gay…. |
 Comment by Lisa G. May 16th, 2009 at 7:47 pm |
This would be funny except for the fact that this kind of gender essentialism is EVERYWHERE. |
|
Comment by Nance Confer May 16th, 2009 at 8:56 pm |
Oh, this talk has a label? Nance |
 Comment by JJ Ross May 16th, 2009 at 9:47 pm |
Well, not EVERYWHERE . . .
|
|
Comment by JJ Ross May 16th, 2009 at 9:48 pm |
Not that I am arguing against Lisa G., with whom I “essentially” am the same! 😉 |
|
Comment by JJ Ross May 16th, 2009 at 9:57 pm |
Ack, sorry — that is indeed a good how-we-screw-up-thought link but not the one I meant for THIS thread, which should be this instead. |
|
Comment by Lisa G. May 17th, 2009 at 8:26 am |
@ Nance – Yup. I recommend this book: tinyur...pjmcrv @ JJ – The Kinsey scale measures sexual preferences something entirely different from one’s gender identity. No one’s entirely sure how a person’s gender identity, sexual orientation, and physical sex all interact. |
|
Comment by JJ Ross May 17th, 2009 at 11:19 am |
Point taken. Different yet mysteriously connected? |
|
Comment by Lisa G. May 17th, 2009 at 12:07 pm |
And furthermore! (heh) Physical sex can be broken down into a few categories like chromosomal sex, which primary sex organs are present and to what degree, and which primary sex organs one’s brain is “wired” to. @ JJ – Maybe connected, but then again maybe not as much as society conflates them. |
|
Comment by JJ Ross May 19th, 2009 at 11:56 am |
And does this fit in there somewhere? 😉 |